A federal judge in the Middle District of Florida in Tampa issued an ex parte order last week directing the Marshall's office to seize the computer of a juror.
|Renoir, Jurors Seeking Evidence|
Clearly if any internet information was used by members of the jury before or during jury deliberations, then the Defendant may not have received a fair trial.
One wonders if spreading cellphone technology with ready access to the internet will make fair criminal trials impossible in the future.
The federal judge recanted his decision on seizing the former juror's computer based on possible juror misconduct after argument from counsel according to press reports:
It's ironic that federal prosecutors addressed privacy and due process issues to the Judge to solidify their conviction, as they're more apt to trample these bastions of liberty. Yet more ironic perhaps is that the Defense seeks the computer files thru any means necessary.
Ultimately the Court made a better decision in requiring that the Juror appear before him in a week and to come armed with the computer so both sides can have an opportunity to have experts examine the google searches made during the trial.
Unhappily these confounded Judges are still somewhat unwilling to have folks reading this blog during jury deliberations. From my experience in Federal Trials your Clearwater Criminal Attorney has no doubt that the entire jury panel was repeatedly cautioned by the Judge to make their decision based only on the information provided by the lawyers or the Court during the trial as this insures the certainty that the Defendant receives a fair trial based on the evidence and the applicable federal law.