A recent DUI manslaughter case in Pinellas County pits two sets of parents against each other. One set of parents have lost a child to death, the other set of parents may lose their child to the criminal justice system with a Judge and at least one Clearwater Criminal Defense Lawyer wondering what Solomon might do; cut the Defendant in half?
The two USF students had been friends since kindergaten till the terrible night when an automobile accident took the life of one while the other was driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI).
The driver has shown remorse, talking thru her tears about the dangers of alcohol and the loss of her best friend to high schools and college students.
Should the survivor be sent to prison? The parents of the dead child want fifteen years. The parents of the living child want no prison at all. The prosecutor wants ten years.
Clearly the driver should be punished. However, DUI Manslaughter may be one of the few crimes where an assumption of risk by the victim should be considered in sentencing.
The victim also chose to drink that night. The victim chose to get into that car knowing that her friend was impaired, under the influence and likely DUI. Shouldn't her decisions have some impact on the outcome of the case?
If so, jail should not be as inevitable as mercy. If your seeking the best possible arguments in a Tampa Bay murder case contact a Clearwater Criminal Defense Attorney.
Tuesday, September 18, 2007
Wednesday, July 12, 2006
CRIME RATE DECLINES WHILE ARRESTS RISE IN TAMPA BAY
The paper reports this morning that crime rates in Tampa Florida as in most of the rest of the nation drifted lower this year, something of a surprise to every Clearwater Criminal Attorneys as the number of Floridians who are incarcerated continues to rise. I'll stop for a moment for any criminal defense attorneys, fond colleagues and friends, to wipe their eyes before they try to finish reading this sentence. There, there brighten up! It's all in what you define as "serious crime."
Governor Bush suggests that it was his policies of more jail cells and long term sentences that are the immediate cause of the fall of serious crime. But new studies show the truth that Florida's prison and criminal justice system has failed to deter crime despite the use of cocaine going down in Florida as unlawful prescription fraud drug use rises, because Florida fails to do anything effective as Europe has with drug decriminalization.
And it is true that his effective leadership included the appointmant of the man who for years ran the brutal Florida prison system and who now faces Federal prison himself having just pled guilty to bribery in Federal Court. One might think that the Governor is correct, that it was his policies that forced down serious crime, if his policies in Florida might somehow have contributed to the fall in serious crime in places as far flung as New York City and San Francisco.
Yet our smiling Governor fails to note that "serious crime" is defined as violent crime and does not encompass the escalation of other very destructive crimes such as Identity Theft. Identity Theft is especially pernicious, bringing financial havoc and disorder while ruining the lives of those it touches.
Clearly the rate of serious crime falling in the United States is due to an aging population and a reasonably good economy. But it may also have something to do with the drug culture that has gone from crack cocaine and the robberies and burglaries that sustained cocaine use to the much more deliberative crimes caused by crystal methamphetamine users who often turn to nonviolent crimes such as Identity Theft, which has been defined as not serious by our government. Every crime is serious to the the family of those charged, if you've been charged with a serious crime call a Clearwater Criminal Defense Lawyer to help defend you.
Governor Bush suggests that it was his policies of more jail cells and long term sentences that are the immediate cause of the fall of serious crime. But new studies show the truth that Florida's prison and criminal justice system has failed to deter crime despite the use of cocaine going down in Florida as unlawful prescription fraud drug use rises, because Florida fails to do anything effective as Europe has with drug decriminalization.
And it is true that his effective leadership included the appointmant of the man who for years ran the brutal Florida prison system and who now faces Federal prison himself having just pled guilty to bribery in Federal Court. One might think that the Governor is correct, that it was his policies that forced down serious crime, if his policies in Florida might somehow have contributed to the fall in serious crime in places as far flung as New York City and San Francisco.
Yet our smiling Governor fails to note that "serious crime" is defined as violent crime and does not encompass the escalation of other very destructive crimes such as Identity Theft. Identity Theft is especially pernicious, bringing financial havoc and disorder while ruining the lives of those it touches.
Clearly the rate of serious crime falling in the United States is due to an aging population and a reasonably good economy. But it may also have something to do with the drug culture that has gone from crack cocaine and the robberies and burglaries that sustained cocaine use to the much more deliberative crimes caused by crystal methamphetamine users who often turn to nonviolent crimes such as Identity Theft, which has been defined as not serious by our government. Every crime is serious to the the family of those charged, if you've been charged with a serious crime call a Clearwater Criminal Defense Lawyer to help defend you.
Thursday, July 06, 2006
ROCK PAPER SCISSORS SAYS FED UP FEDERAL JUDGE
Sometimes even the Best Clearwater Defense Lawyers can't agree to be cordial. One angry and fed up federal judge in the Middle District of Florida which includes St. Petersburg, Largo, Clearwater and Tampa Bay, recently found a unique but not quite new form of alternate dispute resolution for two bickering attorneys unable and unwilling to agree to a location for depositions to be taken. The judge ordered (see below) the two attorneys to meet in front of the courthouse and to engage in one game of Rock, Paper, Scissors and for the winner to decide where the depostions would be held.
Perhaps this would be an excellent way to resolve more of our civil and criminal legal disputes. Here's the gist of the Order:
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to designate location of a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition (Doc. 105). Upon consideration of the Motion – the latest in a series of Gordian knots that the parties have been unable to untangle without enlisting the assistance of the federal courts – it is
ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED.
One wonders if Rock Paper Scissors will be featured on future Bar Examinations in Florida. Your favorite Clearwater Criminal Defense Attorney has seen only one other blistering Judge's order that is as good as this one, in which an attorney who imagines himself to be Ernest Hemingway is denied permission to continue a murder for hire case so that he could travel to Key West for the Hemingway lookalike contest.
Perhaps this would be an excellent way to resolve more of our civil and criminal legal disputes. Here's the gist of the Order:
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to designate location of a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition (Doc. 105). Upon consideration of the Motion – the latest in a series of Gordian knots that the parties have been unable to untangle without enlisting the assistance of the federal courts – it is
ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED.
Instead, the Court will fashion a new form of alternative dispute resolution, to wit: at 4:00 P.M. on Friday, June 30, 2006, counsel shall convene at a neutral site agreeable to both parties.
If counsel cannot agree on a neutral site, they shall meet on the front steps of the Sam M. Gibbons U.S. Courthouse, 801 North Florida Ave., Tampa, Florida 33602. Each lawyer shall be entitled to be accompanied by one paralegal who shall act as an attendant and witness. At that time and location, counsel shall engage in one (1) game of "rock, paper, scissors." The winner of this engagement shall be entitled to select the location for the 30(b)(6) deposition to be held somewhere in Hillsborough County during the period July 11-12, 2006. If either party disputes the outcome of this engagement, an appeal may be filed and a hearing will be held at 8:30 A.M. on Friday, July 7, 2006 before the undersigned in Courtroom 3, George C. Young United States Courthouse and Federal Building, 80 North Hughey Avenue, Orlando, Florida 32801.
One wonders if Rock Paper Scissors will be featured on future Bar Examinations in Florida. Your favorite Clearwater Criminal Defense Attorney has seen only one other blistering Judge's order that is as good as this one, in which an attorney who imagines himself to be Ernest Hemingway is denied permission to continue a murder for hire case so that he could travel to Key West for the Hemingway lookalike contest.
Wednesday, July 05, 2006
THE BEST CRIMINAL DEFENSE: FUN & VITAL FLORIDA TRIAL
The more important the case, the more likely that the judge will do his or her best to make you look good. And the less important the case the more apt you are to fall on your face if for no other reason that those involved are simply bored. If the game isn't interesting there are plenty of judges who are apt to play you like the cat plays the mouse.
When the Best Clearwater Defense Lawyers go to jury trial on first degree Murder or an Armed Burglary or white colar crime such as Theft, Bribery, Embezzlement or Fraud, the attorneys will be treated with more respect at every stage of the proceedings.
Human nature being what it is everyone involved in the case tries harder and works harder when the stakes are greater especially a good judge.
Part of the reason is that any possible appeal of a conviction could carry with it the argument that the defense counsel failed to zealously defend his client or that the defendant had incompetent counsel. Further, in an appeal the judge's legal decisons will be looked at for legal error. Any mistakes of law or in jury instuctions or in evidence could result in a conviction being overtunred. The prosecutor's actions will be also be examined to see if there was prosecutorial misconduct.
The more complex the case for Clearwater Criminal Defense Attorneys, the more likely that the record of the case will reflect well on all three parties with the judge doing everything he can to make certain that the defense gets a clean shot at a fair trial. The message for any good defense attorney then is to always add an interesting wrinkle or twist to the case such as a compelling personal story about the defendant. The trial must be vital and fun. Let the Court know why you are trying the case, and the Judge will do whatever is possible to give you a fair hearing.
When the Best Clearwater Defense Lawyers go to jury trial on first degree Murder or an Armed Burglary or white colar crime such as Theft, Bribery, Embezzlement or Fraud, the attorneys will be treated with more respect at every stage of the proceedings.
Human nature being what it is everyone involved in the case tries harder and works harder when the stakes are greater especially a good judge.
Part of the reason is that any possible appeal of a conviction could carry with it the argument that the defense counsel failed to zealously defend his client or that the defendant had incompetent counsel. Further, in an appeal the judge's legal decisons will be looked at for legal error. Any mistakes of law or in jury instuctions or in evidence could result in a conviction being overtunred. The prosecutor's actions will be also be examined to see if there was prosecutorial misconduct.
The more complex the case for Clearwater Criminal Defense Attorneys, the more likely that the record of the case will reflect well on all three parties with the judge doing everything he can to make certain that the defense gets a clean shot at a fair trial. The message for any good defense attorney then is to always add an interesting wrinkle or twist to the case such as a compelling personal story about the defendant. The trial must be vital and fun. Let the Court know why you are trying the case, and the Judge will do whatever is possible to give you a fair hearing.
Wednesday, April 26, 2006
CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT IN FLORIDA DEATH CASES?
Is the history of capital punishment a history of attempting to make something that is inherently cruel and unusual culturally palpable in an ever changing culture?
Until 1924 one could still see public hangings in Clearwater, St. Petersburg and Tampa Bay, Florida; something your favorite Clearwater Criminal Defense Lawyer is glad he missed as who knows who they might have hanged. Around that time electrocution was deemed faster, more humane, and less likely to be botched or at least not botched in immediate public view. Then with the new century in 2000 lethal injection with its promise of sleep and mere oblivion became the standard of a good, quiet government mandated death. Making Death for Death easier to impose, less painful and more palatable, in murder convictions where looking at unsolved murder cold cases in Florida makes us yearn to find and punish the offenders. Should the murderers be murdered with an eye for an eye? And in an America where mass murders fill the news shouldn't the punishment be as severe as the crime, even if an autopsy of the shooters brain reveals that the murderer had no control of his actions?
Yet various Federal Circuit Courts across the country have split on whether lethal injection in constitutionally permissable in murder cases, so that the United States Supreme Court finds itself again looking at the issue of cruel and unusual punishment in death penalty cases to clear the division.
As applied, it would seem that death by injection would almost by definition have to be reasonable if death by electrocution is contitutional. Yet, in a number of states doctors have refused to adminster the three steps to induce sleep, to induce paralyses, and eventually to stop the heart.
Further, even with careful and knowledgable medical administering of the chemicals, there is evidence that the peaceful death-sleep imagined by its proponents often goes horribly awry when wrenching pain strikes without the sleep.
What is life? Isn't every death an extinction? How could any death not be cruel? Shouldn't the real question not be how the government kills, but why? If the government debases life by the act of cooly administering death, it only teaches those who kill that killing is justified.
You and your Clearwater Criminal Attorney live in a country with a divided culture, abounding with government policies that claim to protect life only to waste its values destroying lives with brutal government action.
Until 1924 one could still see public hangings in Clearwater, St. Petersburg and Tampa Bay, Florida; something your favorite Clearwater Criminal Defense Lawyer is glad he missed as who knows who they might have hanged. Around that time electrocution was deemed faster, more humane, and less likely to be botched or at least not botched in immediate public view. Then with the new century in 2000 lethal injection with its promise of sleep and mere oblivion became the standard of a good, quiet government mandated death. Making Death for Death easier to impose, less painful and more palatable, in murder convictions where looking at unsolved murder cold cases in Florida makes us yearn to find and punish the offenders. Should the murderers be murdered with an eye for an eye? And in an America where mass murders fill the news shouldn't the punishment be as severe as the crime, even if an autopsy of the shooters brain reveals that the murderer had no control of his actions?
Yet various Federal Circuit Courts across the country have split on whether lethal injection in constitutionally permissable in murder cases, so that the United States Supreme Court finds itself again looking at the issue of cruel and unusual punishment in death penalty cases to clear the division.
As applied, it would seem that death by injection would almost by definition have to be reasonable if death by electrocution is contitutional. Yet, in a number of states doctors have refused to adminster the three steps to induce sleep, to induce paralyses, and eventually to stop the heart.
Further, even with careful and knowledgable medical administering of the chemicals, there is evidence that the peaceful death-sleep imagined by its proponents often goes horribly awry when wrenching pain strikes without the sleep.
What is life? Isn't every death an extinction? How could any death not be cruel? Shouldn't the real question not be how the government kills, but why? If the government debases life by the act of cooly administering death, it only teaches those who kill that killing is justified.
You and your Clearwater Criminal Attorney live in a country with a divided culture, abounding with government policies that claim to protect life only to waste its values destroying lives with brutal government action.
Tuesday, March 28, 2006
CONSENT TO SEARCH WITHOUT WARRANTS IN TAMPA BAY FLORIDA
A few days ago the United States Supreme Court ruled in an important case that changed the law involving consent to search a dwelling by police officers. Newly appointed Chief Justice Roberts found himself in dissent with the majority. see Randolph v. Scott http://www.supremecourtus.gov/
In the case two co-owners lived in a house one giving consent to search the dwelling and the other vehemently objecting to any search. The police searched and found cocaine without a warrant something your favorite Clearwater Criminal Defense Attorney finds reprehensible as you might too.
Previously the law seemed settled that either party could give valid consent for a search. However, the majority of the court found that a typical person would not go into a home where anyone living there, especially an owner, objected to entry. The court noted that either occupant in real life situations, for example, who should come to dinner, could veto visitors.
This Supreme Court is placed in a unique historical position of balancing and restricting an administration that has lost sight of the fact that liberties are only protected by rights. At a time when the executive branch of government is curtailing rights, this narrow decision slightly limits the government's ability to search without a warrant in Clearwater, Largo, St. Petersburg and Tampa Bay, Florida; where deputies lie to get into homes to look for evidence of crime, deputies use secret video evidence of shoppers and a Big Brother Government tracks our movements using GPS.
Since his arrival Chief Justice Roberts attempted to force a solemn truce of unity among the disparate justices in a time of upheavel for the court. But sadly Justice Roberts is not the leader to protect our rights nor a man apt to bite the hand that fed him.
This case ended that brief unreal unity and should give pause to any true libertarian. The Chief Justice wrote that the majority was going beyond the constitution to grant Americans this new right of not allowing our government to search one's own home without probable cause, without a search warrant.
Yet his literal reading ignores the fact that warrantless searches are explicitly protected by the Constitution in direct language, if one was a true libertarian or strict constructionist as the conservatives claim to be, then all warrantless searches are beyond the Constitution and every search should require a warrant.
A Clearwater Criminal Defense Lawyer hopes the court will rise and take hold of the historic moment to balance the administration's attacks on the rights of Americans, but if so, it will do so with its chief justice dissenting all of the way ignoring the very Constitution he claims to protect.
In the case two co-owners lived in a house one giving consent to search the dwelling and the other vehemently objecting to any search. The police searched and found cocaine without a warrant something your favorite Clearwater Criminal Defense Attorney finds reprehensible as you might too.
Previously the law seemed settled that either party could give valid consent for a search. However, the majority of the court found that a typical person would not go into a home where anyone living there, especially an owner, objected to entry. The court noted that either occupant in real life situations, for example, who should come to dinner, could veto visitors.
This Supreme Court is placed in a unique historical position of balancing and restricting an administration that has lost sight of the fact that liberties are only protected by rights. At a time when the executive branch of government is curtailing rights, this narrow decision slightly limits the government's ability to search without a warrant in Clearwater, Largo, St. Petersburg and Tampa Bay, Florida; where deputies lie to get into homes to look for evidence of crime, deputies use secret video evidence of shoppers and a Big Brother Government tracks our movements using GPS.
Since his arrival Chief Justice Roberts attempted to force a solemn truce of unity among the disparate justices in a time of upheavel for the court. But sadly Justice Roberts is not the leader to protect our rights nor a man apt to bite the hand that fed him.
This case ended that brief unreal unity and should give pause to any true libertarian. The Chief Justice wrote that the majority was going beyond the constitution to grant Americans this new right of not allowing our government to search one's own home without probable cause, without a search warrant.
Yet his literal reading ignores the fact that warrantless searches are explicitly protected by the Constitution in direct language, if one was a true libertarian or strict constructionist as the conservatives claim to be, then all warrantless searches are beyond the Constitution and every search should require a warrant.
A Clearwater Criminal Defense Lawyer hopes the court will rise and take hold of the historic moment to balance the administration's attacks on the rights of Americans, but if so, it will do so with its chief justice dissenting all of the way ignoring the very Constitution he claims to protect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)